<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for New In Cinema</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newincinema.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newincinema.com</link>
	<description>A UK movie blog for everything new in cinema</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 23:14:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on News round-up &#8211; 6th Feb 2012 by Mike P Williams (@littlestpicshow)</title>
		<link>http://newincinema.com/news-round-up-6th-feb-2012/#comment-544</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike P Williams (@littlestpicshow)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 23:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newincinema.com/?p=1541#comment-544</guid>
		<description>Lovely round up, sir!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lovely round up, sir!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Jack And Jill &#8211; Review (&#8230;Kinda) by Daniel Sarath</title>
		<link>http://newincinema.com/jack-and-jill-review-kinda/#comment-536</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Sarath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 20:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newincinema.com/?p=1479#comment-536</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t get me wrong, I&#039;m a big fan of what he does and it certainly influences my writing. But I don&#039;t want to have that same audience. I&#039;m not competing for Ultra Culture&#039;s followers, I&#039;m just writing what I think will amuse people. Surely not everyone who writes sophisticated, elaborate reviews of art house cinema is copying The Guardian, for example.

Trust me, I&#039;d like to be one of those guys! I&#039;m not doing this professionally at all, I have to pay for 95% of the stuff I review on here. Hence the posts about my disappointment with EIFF - it&#039;s a nice chance for ordinary people like me to enjoy the premieres - and Red State - which I will now admit was a knee jerk reaction out of disappointment.

However, I&#039;m impressed that you know my writing, regardless of whether you like them or not. And I do appreciate the criticism.

Thanks again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I&#8217;m a big fan of what he does and it certainly influences my writing. But I don&#8217;t want to have that same audience. I&#8217;m not competing for Ultra Culture&#8217;s followers, I&#8217;m just writing what I think will amuse people. Surely not everyone who writes sophisticated, elaborate reviews of art house cinema is copying The Guardian, for example.</p>
<p>Trust me, I&#8217;d like to be one of those guys! I&#8217;m not doing this professionally at all, I have to pay for 95% of the stuff I review on here. Hence the posts about my disappointment with EIFF &#8211; it&#8217;s a nice chance for ordinary people like me to enjoy the premieres &#8211; and Red State &#8211; which I will now admit was a knee jerk reaction out of disappointment.</p>
<p>However, I&#8217;m impressed that you know my writing, regardless of whether you like them or not. And I do appreciate the criticism.</p>
<p>Thanks again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Jack And Jill &#8211; Review (&#8230;Kinda) by Javier Sandooski</title>
		<link>http://newincinema.com/jack-and-jill-review-kinda/#comment-535</link>
		<dc:creator>Javier Sandooski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 19:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newincinema.com/?p=1479#comment-535</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d say that your trying to make film fans smile or laugh makes it clear that you are definitely following Ultraculture, since he&#039;s the highest profile blogger doing that schtick, and most film blogs have a different goal. As for screeners, fair enough: I&#039;d thought you were one of those reckoning that bloggers were entitled to get screeners of everything and got upset when they didn&#039;t. But it turns out I was thinking of your Red State incident and your comment about only going to EIFF for the premieres, which weren&#039;t quite about the same thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d say that your trying to make film fans smile or laugh makes it clear that you are definitely following Ultraculture, since he&#8217;s the highest profile blogger doing that schtick, and most film blogs have a different goal. As for screeners, fair enough: I&#8217;d thought you were one of those reckoning that bloggers were entitled to get screeners of everything and got upset when they didn&#8217;t. But it turns out I was thinking of your Red State incident and your comment about only going to EIFF for the premieres, which weren&#8217;t quite about the same thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Jack And Jill &#8211; Review (&#8230;Kinda) by Daniel Sarath</title>
		<link>http://newincinema.com/jack-and-jill-review-kinda/#comment-532</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Sarath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 22:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newincinema.com/?p=1479#comment-532</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a big fan of Ultra Culture and I agree that Charlie does better &#039;pointless bollocks&#039; than anyone else in film journalism. But I&#039;m not trying to compete with him or anyone else. I just want to make film fans who stumble upon on my blog smile or laugh. I&#039;m sorry I couldn&#039;t do so on this occasion, but I hope you&#039;ll come back in the future and enjoy something else.

As for seeing this in advance and for free, no, I probably wouldn&#039;t have. I very rarely choose to see anything that I&#039;m certain I won&#039;t enjoy. You can see that in the &#039;cinema releases&#039; box to the right I have avoided Journey 2, for example, despite the face there was an advanced screening of that.

Thanks for your comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a big fan of Ultra Culture and I agree that Charlie does better &#8216;pointless bollocks&#8217; than anyone else in film journalism. But I&#8217;m not trying to compete with him or anyone else. I just want to make film fans who stumble upon on my blog smile or laugh. I&#8217;m sorry I couldn&#8217;t do so on this occasion, but I hope you&#8217;ll come back in the future and enjoy something else.</p>
<p>As for seeing this in advance and for free, no, I probably wouldn&#8217;t have. I very rarely choose to see anything that I&#8217;m certain I won&#8217;t enjoy. You can see that in the &#8216;cinema releases&#8217; box to the right I have avoided Journey 2, for example, despite the face there was an advanced screening of that.</p>
<p>Thanks for your comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Larysa Kondracki and Eilis Kirwin discuss The Whistleblower by Corinne Cluck</title>
		<link>http://newincinema.com/larysa-kondracki-and-eilis-kirwin-discuss-the-whistleblower/#comment-531</link>
		<dc:creator>Corinne Cluck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 21:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newincinema.com/?p=167#comment-531</guid>
		<description>Awesome article post. Want more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome article post. Want more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Jack And Jill &#8211; Review (&#8230;Kinda) by Javier Sandooski</title>
		<link>http://newincinema.com/jack-and-jill-review-kinda/#comment-529</link>
		<dc:creator>Javier Sandooski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 14:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newincinema.com/?p=1479#comment-529</guid>
		<description>Ultraculture is so much better at this pointless bollocks than you are. Plus, bet you still would have seen this in advance and for free if you could have, since that seems to matter so much to you guys these days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ultraculture is so much better at this pointless bollocks than you are. Plus, bet you still would have seen this in advance and for free if you could have, since that seems to matter so much to you guys these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Young Adult &#8211; Review by Daniel Sarath</title>
		<link>http://newincinema.com/young-adult-review/#comment-525</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Sarath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 23:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newincinema.com/?p=1489#comment-525</guid>
		<description>See, Up In The Air and Juno both disappointed me. I found the former to be a little conventional and the latter just tried SO hard to be &#039;indie&#039; and &#039;quirky&#039;. So I was surprisingly pleased to find that Young Adult was so fresh and upfront. And I loved that about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See, Up In The Air and Juno both disappointed me. I found the former to be a little conventional and the latter just tried SO hard to be &#8216;indie&#8217; and &#8216;quirky&#8217;. So I was surprisingly pleased to find that Young Adult was so fresh and upfront. And I loved that about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Young Adult &#8211; Review by Steve Aldersley</title>
		<link>http://newincinema.com/young-adult-review/#comment-524</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Aldersley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 21:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newincinema.com/?p=1489#comment-524</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m looking forward to seeing it again. I scored it 4/5 on first viewing. Up in the Air and Juno were 5/5. This is the kind of film that could grow on me though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m looking forward to seeing it again. I scored it 4/5 on first viewing. Up in the Air and Juno were 5/5. This is the kind of film that could grow on me though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Jack And Jill &#8211; Review (&#8230;Kinda) by Mike P Williams (@littlestpicshow)</title>
		<link>http://newincinema.com/jack-and-jill-review-kinda/#comment-520</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike P Williams (@littlestpicshow)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 16:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newincinema.com/?p=1479#comment-520</guid>
		<description>I only do it because I care about everyone. Who am I kidding? It&#039;s so I can rip it apart in a review =D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I only do it because I care about everyone. Who am I kidding? It&#8217;s so I can rip it apart in a review =D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Jack And Jill &#8211; Review (&#8230;Kinda) by Daniel Sarath</title>
		<link>http://newincinema.com/jack-and-jill-review-kinda/#comment-519</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Sarath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 16:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newincinema.com/?p=1479#comment-519</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re a brave man, Mike. Going where no film fan would in order to warn us all of the danger. *salutes*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re a brave man, Mike. Going where no film fan would in order to warn us all of the danger. *salutes*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

